Robert,

Have you not seen drake-nvo3?

Irrespectively Yours,

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert
> Raszuk
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:59 AM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: Aldrin Isaac; Melinda Shore; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] [mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-03
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> Aldrin's email was not very clear on that especially as he highlighted
> mpls support in hardware.
> 
> However you as Juniper stating " L3VPN and E-VPN over an IP
> infrastructure" it's a great news (after so many years ...)  ! Bravo
> !!!
> 
> Sincerely yours,
> R.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, John E Drake <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > We are talking about L3VPN and E-VPN over an IP infrastructure so
> there is no LDP or RSVP-TE.  Rather, the only label is the service
> label which is distributed via BGP or XMPP.
> >
> > Irrespectively Yours,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> >> Of Robert Raszuk
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 11:06 AM
> >> To: Aldrin Isaac
> >> Cc: Melinda Shore; [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] [mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-03
> >>
> >> Aldirn,
> >>
> >> > Now with support for MPLS in merchant silicon, I don't see any
> good
> >> > reason why MPLS-based DCVPN solutions (IPVPN, E-VPN) should be
> held
> >> > back
> >>
> >> For service demux I see no issue as well
> >>
> >> For transport I see two major issues:
> >>
> >> - MPLS requires new signalling protocol ... DC fabric and hosts
> which
> >> do act as PEs should be as simple as possible, but not simpler hence
> >> introduction of LDP or worse RSVP-TE to signal the labels seems not
> >> helpful.
> >>
> >> - MPLS FECs can not be summarized. With IP we just need information
> >> how to reach subnet X ... with MPLS (even if one would provide the
> >> relaxed
> >> match) FECs are still /32s That's a lot of them in large data
> centers.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> R.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nvo3 mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3


_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to