Hi Lucy, > [Lucy] yes, I see this use case.
Great ! > [Lucy] would you mind say which option in rfc4346 fit to your application? What options are you referring to ? I am talking about SAFI 128 vs SAFI 70 - encoding of routes is the main difference >> In this respect yr claim that EVPN solves the problem is factually >> incorrect too as it requires to build EVPN (SAFI 70) to RFC4364 (SAFI >> 128) gateways or to transition my WAN to be now EVPN based. Both >> options as you can imagine are not that operationally attractive. > > [Lucy] Then, what is the proper operational way for your application? To run RFC4364 within and outside of my DCs. > Do you see that E-IP-VPN may bring operation attractive? I am not claiming that there is no traffic which may not be IP within a data center. However I can not accept that E-IP-VPN is the solution for everything. So perhaps we should come back to origin idea of running both RFC4364 and DC-optimized EVPN as control plane - however decoupled from each other not hard-integrated. Best regards, R. _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
