Dear all, Support. Comment: Does the NVO3 charter need to revise to reflect this?
Thank you, Tina On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, "Vishwas Manral" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I support as a co-author. I am unaware of any IPR related to this draft. -Vishwas On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Benson Schliesser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is consensus to adopt draft-mity-nvo3-use-case-04 as an NVO3 working group draft. Please respond to this email on the list with 'support' or 'do not support'. Please also send any comments on the draft to the NVO3 list. We are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. This poll closes on 14 February 2013. Cheers, -Benson & Matthew _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
