+1 "However, IMO there is still a need to have a standard interface"
On Jul 24, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Thomas Narten <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2. Is there a standard interface between NVA and VM orchestration, or a >> private interface? Hope to see more description in detail. > > Today, there are already existing VM orchestration systems that embed > some or all of the functionality of the NVA. I don't see those systems > as changing or wanting to implement a standard interface just for the > sake of doing so. So, today, there are private interfaces that do that > and they will presumably continue to exist in the future. > > However, IMO there is still a need to have a standard interface so > that entities other than hypervisors can interact with the > NVA. Existing VM orchestration systems that have an embedded NVA may > then find it useful to implement such a standard interface, but I > would expect they would continue to also support their private > interface for backwards compatability with other components of their > systems. > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
