On 8/23/13 7:22 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) wrote: > This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs determine if there > is consensus to adopt draft-hartman-nvo3-security-requirements-01.txt as > an NVO3 working group draft.
What's the reason for not incorporating this material into the other requirements drafts? I think that the text is a good start but I am generally not that enthusiastic about moving security issues into separate documents unless there's a compelling reason. Melinda _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
