Excellent, I agree completely. Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2013, at 8:30 PM, "Melinda Shore" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/27/13 1:47 PM, Eric Gray wrote: >> So, my support for adoption of this draft depends on the authors >> willingness to make the modifications necessary for the draft to >> fulfill its role as intended in the WG charter. > > I don't expect -00 working group drafts to be particularly > good, and I don't feel that adoption should be contingent on > how close a document is to being publication-ready. However, > this one is so far off the mark that I think that it might > be a good idea if the authors revised it prior to the > issuance of another adoption call. The basic issue here is > whether or not the authors understand the issues that Dan > raised. They've indicated that they're willing to revise > the draft according to his suggestions but frankly the > charter text really is very clear. I'm not opposed to > adopting a draft by these authors but I'm opposed to adopting > *this* draft. > > Melinda > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
