Hi Linda, It is here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kreeger-nvo3-hypervisor-nve-cp/
However, it just expired recently. I'm working on a update for it though. - Larry From: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, September 9, 2013 3:30 PM To: Larry Kreeger <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: Questions to draft-ietf-nvo3-nve-nva-cp-req-00 Larry, I couldn’t even locate I-D.kreeger-nvo3-hypervisor-nve-cp-req on IETF website. Is it something that you are working on? Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 3:31 PM To: Larry Kreeger (kreeger) Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Questions to draft-ietf-nvo3-nve-nva-cp-req-00 Larry, et al, Section 3 of the draft states that the scenario of NVE residing on a physical network switch is not in the scope being discussed in this draft (last sentence of the second paragraph). But the bullet 3 in the same section states: [cid:[email protected]] Are those “End Devices” different from the “Tenant System”? Are there any indication to differentiate “End Devices” from “Tenant Systems”? Another question, why have two places to define the NVE-NVA requirement, one for NVE being embedded on Hypervisor, one for NVE being on separate physical switches? I see the requirement for both scenarios quite similar. Can you elaborate the major differences? Linda
<<attachment: image001.png>>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
