Hi Matthew, Thank you for the explanation. Then I am OK with the adoption since this is WG adoption, not WG last call.
One comments to the draft, one of the motivation for NVO3 is to solve the scaling problem as described in the charter. Then the scaling factor for each solution should be considered. Regards Lizhong On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) < [email protected]> wrote: > Lucy, Lizhong, > > The point of adopting the draft is to provide a base document that the > WG can develop further. One would expect that development to include some > conclusions on the technology direction going forward. At this stage, a > draft does not have to be complete or have concrete conclusions to be > adopted. If the draft is adopted, then the editors must reflect the > consensus of the WG In the draft including conclusions on the technology > choices. > > Regards > > Matthew > > > > On 17/09/2013 16:36, "Lucy yong" <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is what I see as well. I like to hear the answer for the question. > **** > > ** ** > > Lucy**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Lizhong Jin > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:27 AM > *To:* Matthew Bocci > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] Poll for adoption and IPR check: > draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt**** > > ** ** > > Hi,**** > > It seems this draft provides a template for analysis without any > conclusion. Or did I missed somthing important?**** > > I would support if the draft could provide further insightful technology > viewpoint. Or is it intentional for the WG to adopt first, and then > generate the technology view?**** > > **** > > Thanks**** > > Lizhong**** > > **** > > **** > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:57:05 +0000 > Subject: [nvo3] Poll for adoption and IPR check: > draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt**** > > This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs judge if there is > consensus to adopt draft-gbclt-nvo3-gap-analysis-00.txt as an NVO3 working > group draft.**** > > ** ** > > Please respond to this email on the list with 'support' or 'do not > support'.**** > > ** ** > > Please also send any comments on the draft to the NVO3 list.**** > > ** ** > > Please consider whether this draft takes the right basic approach to a gap > analysis, and is a good basis for the work going forward (and potential > future rechartering). It does not have to be perfect at this stage.**** > > ** ** > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies > to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).**** > > ** ** > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will > not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and > contributor.**** > > ** ** > > If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.**** > > ** ** > > This poll closes on Friday 20th September.**** > > ** ** > > Regards**** > > ** ** > > Matthew and Benson**** > > ** ** > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
