I agree that we have analyze on LISP applicability and gap to NVO3. Could someone explain to me how to use LISP solution to provide route path control? For example, in a VN, ingress NVE MUST forward the packets to another NVE at which a tenant system runs firewall software. The second NVE then forwards to the packets to the third NVE where an attached TS has the address that matches the destination address in the inner address on the packets.
Lucy From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Damien Saucez Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 3:07 PM To: Yves Hertoghs (yhertogh) Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [nvo3] LISP control plane input into gap analysis draft I agree that LISP is an interesting approach for nvo3. Regards, Damien Saucez On 04 Nov 2013, at 12:25, Yves Hertoghs (yhertogh) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, As requested at the IETF88 physical meeting: Draft-hertoghs-nvo3-lisp-controlplane-unified uses LISP as a control plane for a combination of data planes. It used the (at the time) current versions of the cp and dp nvo3 drafts and shows how this unified LISP CP solution satisfies them. As a result sections 3.3 and 3.4 can be used as a direct input into draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis. So, i'd like to request to add LISP as a CP option to draft-ietf-nvo3-gap-analysis , and use the text in 3.3 and 3.4 to complete the current gap analysis. Let me know if you dont agree/have questions Yves Hertoghs _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
