>Adding the authors > >Yves > >On 10/12/13 01:20, "Nischal Sheth" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>Hi Authors, >> >>A couple of comments/questions on the draft: >> >>a) It would be useful to have the ability to specify that the forwarding >>context >>for the inner payload is the same as that for the outer header i.e. the >>VNI is >>a don't care. This could be achieved by reserving a VNI value, say >>0xFFFFFF >>or 0, or by using an additional bit from the flags field. >> >>b) The current version says that determining capabilities is out of >>scope. Are >>you planning to allocate a Tunnel Type code point in the BGP >>encapsulation >>extended community in later version or via a separate document? >> >>Thanks, >>Nischal >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>nvo3 mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > >_______________________________________________ >nvo3 mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
