Thanks for the reply Matthew.

Dino

On Feb 18, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Dino
> 
> It¹s fine to discuss solutions, indeed we need to discuss solutions and
> how they meet the requirements and fit with the architecture as input to
> the gap analysis draft. However, we are not yet in a position to adopt any
> particular solution until we are rechartered to allow this.
> 
> We¹ve prioritised meeting time in the past to ensure that we have
> sufficient time to cover the requirements / framework drafts, first.
> 
> The gap analysis draft is intended to provide sufficient information for
> us to make a choice as to which solutions (if any) we want to take further.
> 
> Solutions may exist in other working groups or already standardised.
> However, the gap analysis may identify requirements that are not satisfied
> by existing protocols. In that case, we may need to develop extensions to
> existing protocols in the WGs that own those protocols, or if there is no
> obvious existing home we may take them on in NVO3.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> On 16/02/2014 20:16, "Dino Farinacci" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> At one point I asked the chairs about when it was the right time to talk
>> about solutions to NVo3's requirements and problem statements. At that
>> time, the working group was at a stage where it was not ready to talk
>> about solutions.
>> 
>> I have seen from recent drafts that solutions have been referenced and
>> proposals are coming out. Has that policy changed? And are we at a more
>> advanced stage now?
>> 
>> And if so, here is a set of questions:
>> 
>> (1) Has there been a list of solutions that is allowed to be referenced
>> and others that are not?
>> 
>> (2) Is the intention to be exhaustive or practically complete?
>> 
>> (3) Will the working group have their own solution independent of other
>> solutions that are already in RFC or Internet Draft form?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dino
>> _______________________________________________
>> nvo3 mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to