> As I see it, the point with Geneve is that the tunneling protocol is actually > the least interesting part of the overall system. So perhaps the industry > can work with a common tunneling format that provides both data plane > interoperability and sufficient room in the header for implementation > specific differentiation (metadata). Instead, perhaps the industry can focus > on competing and differentiating at the control and management planes. Not > too dissimilar from what happened when we agreed on Ethernet and IP > encapsulation.
Then why did you create yet another encapsulation the world does not need? Dino P.S. I know the answer. ;-) _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
