[Could not finish my question at the open-mic in consideration to fellow IETFrs behind me]
Author's stand on the metadata from the presentation and responses: 1. Metadata is for innovating and future-proofing 2. Metadata is indeed tied to the transport 3. Metadata will be standardized as they are defined 4. If metadata needs to be used on different transports, it is up to the folks defining it to take it to each and every transport and request standardization – obviously, these needs happen for every single one of them. #4 makes absolutely no sense to me, please think about it. Why in the world does everybody have to go through the pain on every transport including those transports that are not defined yet but will be in the future. Would you rather not want these guys to standardize it once and use it in whatever transport they need to use ? Isn't that future proofing in a much better way ? Surendra. PS: BTW, this is no endorsement of the draft; rather wanted to get this straight given the discussion; I had to state It, sorry.
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
