Thanks, Lucy.

Personally, I agree that this would be a valuable part of a NVO3 solution.
As a WG chair, I think we may need to focus our work in multiple phases...
Can you suggest specific text that might help with this goal in the charter?

Cheers,
-Benson


On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Lucy yong <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Benson and Matthew,
>
>
>
> The charter text is in general and good.
>
>
>
> I suggest that the charter also includes the solutions for a virtual
> network, i.e. DCVPN, spanning multiple DCs and a virtual network
> interconnecting to another virtual network in DC(s) and an external network.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lucy
>
>
>
> *From:* nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Benson
> Schliesser
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:42 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
>
>
>
> Just a reminder that Matthew and I are looking for feedback on the draft
> text of a new NVO3 charter. Can it be that we wrote a charter so perfect
> there are no comments..?
>
>
>
> The draft charter text is quoted in my email below. For reference it can
> also be found at
> http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/nvo3/charter-ietf-nvo3-01-rev-20140808.txt
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Benson & Matthew
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Benson Schliesser* <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:53 PM
> Subject: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Dear NVO3 Contributors -
>
> As discussed during the NVO3 meeting at IETF-90 in Toronto, the chairs
> have been drafting a new / revised charter for the WG. The latest draft
> charter text is below for your review.
>
> Frankly, we suspect that some of the wording could be further improved to
> be more clear and/or precise. With that in mind we ask for your help -
> please let us know if something seems unclear or if you have suggestions
> for better wording.
>
> If you have feedback please post it to the list for discussion within the
> next 2 weeks.
>
> Thanks,
> -Benson & Matthew
>
> An NVO3 solution, also known as a Data Center Virtual Private Network
> (DCVPN),
> is a set of protocols and/or protocol extensions that address the issues
> described by draft-ietf-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement consistent with the
> approach described by draft-ietf-nvo3-framework.
>
> NVO3 will document DCVPN requirements for both control plane protocol(s)
> and
> data plane encapsulation format(s), as well as management, operational,
> maintenance, troubleshooting, security and OAM protocol requirements.
> Additionally, NVO3 will document common use-cases for DCVPN solutions.
>
> Consistent with the documents described above, the NVO3 WG will document an
> architecture for DCVPNs within a data center environment based on the
> following
> architectural design points:
> -   A logically centralized NVA control plane
> -   Support for an underlay IP data plane between NVEs
>
> Based on this architecture the NVO3 WG will develop one or more NVO3
> solutions.
> This may include documenting applicability of existing protocols,
> contributing
> to the development of protocol extensions by other WGs and/or SDOs, and/or
> developing new protocols as appropriate.
>
> Solutions and/or protocols that were developed outside of the IETF, but not
> developed by another SDO, and that have multiple interoperable
> implementations
> may be adopted by the NVO3 WG for further development, based on WG
> consensus,
> if requested by the authors .
>
> If the NVO3 WG anticipates the adoption of the technologies of another SDO,
> such as the IEEE, as part of any DCVPN solution, it will liaise with that
> SDO
> to ensure the compatibility of the approach.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to