With those changes, the draft charter update looks good to me. Pat

-----Original Message-----
From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:47 PM
To: Benson Schliesser
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Second Draft Charter Update for Discussion

Hi Benson,

Yes, the term "End Device" is consistent with
draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-00
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req/>, and
the NVO3 Framework document.

Thanks, Larry

On 8/26/14 6:46 PM, "Benson Schliesser" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi, Larry.
>
>On Aug 25, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Overall, I think this is much better.  I have a few nits inline below.
>
>Thanks for the constructive feedback. Comments inline.
>
>>> An NVO3 solution is a set of protocols and/or protocol extensions that
>>> enable
>>> network virtualization within a data center (DC) environment using an
>>> IP-based
>>> overlay approach. It provides layer 2 and layer 3 services
>> 
>> LK> I would say "layer 2 and/or layer 3", saying only and implies both
>> services are always present in an NVO3 solution.
>
>Agreed.
>
>>> The NVO3 WG may produce requirements for a network virtualization
>>>control
>>> plane, and will select, extend, and/or develop one or more control
>>>plane
>>> protocols to support the architecture. Such protocols are expected to
>>> fulfill
>>> the communication requirements between a Tenant System (TS) and Network
>>> Virtualization Edge (NVE),
>> 
>> LK> I think when you say TS above, you really mean the Hypervisor or an
>> End Device such as a Network Service Appliance where the NVE is split
>>with
>> the encap/decap happening in another device, such as a TOR switch.  We
>> have been steering clear of having the untrusted Tenant Systems
>>signaling
>> what networks they want to connect to.
>
>Your interpretation is correct, and I can see that my text is not right.
>If I change TS to "End Device² does that make it correct? Or do you have
>a different suggestion for the text?
>
>Thanks,
>-Benson
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to