Benson, More comments to your reply on VM mobility:
-----Original Message----- From: Benson Schliesser [mailto:[email protected]] > Another important area is seamless VM mobility in Data Center environment to > avoid sub-optimal routing, as described by > draft-ietf-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt. If there is WG consensus to publish the mobility issues draft then we can do so. We don't have to specifically create a milestone for it. That being said, if there is still significant work to-be-done on the draft then the chairs will probably want to create a milestone (just for the sake of good practice, transparency, etc). I think we should decide how to handle this based on a WG discussion about the draft, instead of binding it to the rechartering. It might be worthwhile to have a brief presentation on the draft at the 11-Sep virtual interim meeting - can one of the authors lead this? [Linda] The mobility draft is to address an important area of VM mobility in Data Centers, which the WG had adopted to become WG draft long time ago. We sent request for WG Last call many months ago. But there hasn't been any action. Since the MILESTONEs have separate items for IESG Review and WG adoption for many drafts, it is necessary to list VM Mobility as well. Thanks Linda Cheers, -Benson _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
