On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-nvo3-01-02: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-nvo3/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > overlay/underlay, I was confused, and had to re-read the charter multiple > times. In discussing this matter with Adrian, we concluded: "Definitely > worth a Comment saying "please pick one term and use it" > I think what NVO3 is doing is an overlay. The underlay term (which I see twice) is referring to the IP network that the NVO3 overlay runs across. I suppose we could strike out the underlay term if it is unclear. > "Such requirements should consider OAM and security" > Hopefully LIME will be approved at that same time as this new NVO3 > charter. > Absolutely
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
