Hi Fabio, On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Fabio Maino <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Alia, > what's the rationale of adding LISP to the last sentence? Is it expected > that LISP extensions for DC will happen in the LISP WG, as with BGP? > Yes, there is a WG for LISP and work, if and when in charter, should happen there. This is really about being clear on the solution for NVO3 - which is focused on an orchestration approach for the NVA. There may be multiple ways of having a DC VPN - but NVO3 needs to focus on just that one. Getting focus and agreement will be challenging enough. Thanks for raising the question. Regards, Alia > Thanks, > Fabio > > > > > On 10/2/14, 10:02 AM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > The NVO3 recharter is now going to external review. > The version approved has a couple minor changes or clarifications. > > Do take a look at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-nvo3/ > > Thanks, > Alia > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing [email protected]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
