On 10/7/14 8:32 PM, "Tom Herbert" <[email protected]> wrote:
>You've reverted to posing the networking virtualization problem in >terms of virtual machines which leads to a use case specific >solution-- this is exactly the reason I suggested to not use the term. >The general problem is not (virtual) machine migration, it is a >problem of moving networking state between hosts and adapting the >network to be aware of this. That "networking" state when it is migrated from physical device-1 to device-2, does not migrate alone; It takes along with it, all the applications, connections and forwarding states. Those application expect IP mobility and that moves the problem to the general category of (virtual) machine migration. Sri _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
