On 10/24/14 2:24 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
Tom,
Those are useful features to consider. However, I wouldn't view
them as being part of the meta-data discussion. The meta-data
discussion was triggered by the Geneve draft which proposed ways
to encode vendor-specific data e.g. for applications like firewalls.
(I guess we need a definition of "meta-data").
Would the term "optional data" be more apropos for what I'm proposing
then?
Or just options/extensions?
Regards,
Erik
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
