> Please do send in any missing minutes/notes or any corrections needed to be > made. > Would be glad to entertain them.
For the discussion that happended below: Osama: I think we will need sub VNIs to meet the coming needs. Dino: In LISP we limited to encapsulator to 2^24 David: I am not a fan of Hierarchy Larry: I want 24bits and see it as being plenty. Tom: I will stand for 32bit due to the scale when considering earth bound networks. Lucy: I think the extensibility becomes the key to getting around guessing the size today. Tom: If you define it be 32bits you can certainly use less than 32bits. Pat: I think 24bit is plenty and if it's bigger than that, other scaling issues will appear for a 2^24 flat network. So beyond 24bit should be hierarchical. I said the instance-ID is 24-bits in the LISP data-plane and 32-bits in the LISP control-plane. Dino _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
