I think it's important to point out that all these features which require 
in-network anchoring e.g. multicast replication, mobility/motion, chaining, NAT 
traversal, anycast ... in lisp, use ONE consistent methodology - a "floating" 
anchor in the mapping database can be unambiguously resolved & realized 
dynamically at the network edge Ingres just in time.
Would really be good if this systemic anchoring approach is carried over to 
nvo3, 
rather then each such feature will be built based on a whole new 
methodology-terminology.

--szb

> On Dec 8, 2014, at 16:14, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> RFC 6831 (LISP for Multicast) states: 
>> "The fundamental multicast forwarding model is to encapsulate a multicast 
>> packet into another multicast packet"
> 
> Right, the fundamental model so we have the most efficient form of multicast 
> delivery.
> 
>> So LISP assumes that the underlay network supports some sort of IP multicast 
>> scheme.
> 
> No, LISP does not, just this RFC does. If you look at the other LISP 
> multicast related RFCs, you will see that you can encapsulate multicast 
> packets inside of unicast packets.
> 
> And you can use PIM signaling specified in RFC 6831 to instruct an ETR to 
> encapsulate in unicast.
> 
>> In NVO3 environment, especially in data center environment, the underlay 
>> network may not necessarily support IP multicast. 
>> draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework-01 describes various mechanisms for 
>> forwarding tenant multicast traffic without the underlay network supporting 
>> the multicast protocols.
> 
> Right, see draft-farinacci-lisp-signal-free-multicast-01. It can simplify the 
> control-plane as well as encapsulate in either unicast or multicast.
> 
> Dino
> 
>> 
>> We appreciate your feedback. 
>> 
>> Linda 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 4:17 PM
>> To: Vinay Bannai; Linda Dunbar; Vinay Bannai; Ram (Ramki) Krishnan; Linda 
>> Dunbar; Anoop Ghanwani; Ram Krishnan; Anoop Ghanwani
>> Subject: New Version Notification for 
>> draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework-01.txt
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework-01.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Linda Dunbar and posted to the IETF 
>> repository.
>> 
>> Name:        draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework
>> Revision:    01
>> Title:        Framework of Supporting Applications Specific Multicast in NVO3
>> Document date:    2014-12-08
>> Group:        Individual Submission
>> Pages:        16
>> URL:            
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework-01.txt
>> Status:         
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework/
>> Htmlized:       
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework-01
>> Diff:           
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ghanwani-nvo3-app-mcast-framework-01
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This draft discusses the framework of supporting applications
>>  specific multicast traffic, i.e. the non ARP/ND related
>>  multicast/broadcast traffic, in a network that uses Network
>>  Virtualization using Overlays over Layer 3 (NVO3). It describes the
>>  various mechanisms and considerations that can be used for
>>  delivering those application specific multicast traffic in networks
>>  that use NVO3.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to