Chairs,

Bhumip requested WG adoption of this draft almost two months ago, and it's
since been revised to respond to comments and align it with the
architecture. The draft specifies important functionality for the data
center. Can some action be taken on this, or a response as to why not?

Thanks,
Andy


On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Qiang,
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Zu Qiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello, Bhumip
> >
> >                 Reading the section 4, the described ARP/ND updating
> > procedures, both IPv4and IPv6, are not aligned with the procedure
> described
> > in the architecture draft. In the architecture draft, the TS traffic is
> > always forwarded by the NVE based on the inner-outer address mapping
> table
> > which is always configured by the NVA.
>
> Yes, you are right.
>
> > According to your draft, the VM sends
> > ARP / ND after the VM mobility. Then the remote NVEs updates the
> inner-outer
> > address mapping table based on the data plane learning, i.e. snooping on
> the
> > APR / ND messages without any NVA-NVE control protocol. The problem is
> that
> > the NVE and the NVA may be out of sync. Are you going to define any NVA
> > updating  procedure later?
> >
>
> Yes, we now updated the draft and made it compatible with the NVA and
> central database approach.
> You can see the draft in:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-06.txt
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet
> >
> >
> > Have a nice day
> >
> > Zu Qiang
> >
> >
> >
> > From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 10:03 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [nvo3] Re. WG adoption consideratios for
> > draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-05.txt
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Requesting for WG adotoption of this draft
> >
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip/).
> >
> >
> >
> > As you know, managing virtual machine mobility is one of the major
> > requirements for overlay networks, especially in data centers, and this
> > draft addresses this.
> >
> >
> >
> > If we are missing any crucial considerations, KINDLY bring those to our
> > attention ASAP.
> >
> >
> >
> > Many Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best.
> >
> > Bhumip
> >                    __o
> >              _ `\ <, _
> > .......... ( • ) / ( • ) ......................
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
> > Date: Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:35 PM
> > Subject: [nvo3] New Version Notification for
> > draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-05.txt
> > To: "[email protected]" <
> >
> > [email protected]>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We revised VM Mobility solution draft as follows. This revision is
> > based on the comments received during the interim meeting last year
> > and the solution satisfies all requirements in RFC 7364, etc.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Behcet
> >
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-05.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Behcet Sarikaya and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:           draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip
> > Revision:       05
> > Title:          Virtual Machine Mobility Protocol for Overlay Networks
> > Document date:  2015-01-30
> > Group:          Individual Submission
> > Pages:          12
> > URL:
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-05.txt
> > Status:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip/
> > Htmlized:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-05
> > Diff:
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-05
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    This document specifies a virtual machine mobility protocol in data
> >    centers built with overlay-based network virtualization approach.
> >    The protocol is based on the virtual machine sending a gratuitous
> >    Address Resolution Protocol request in IPv4 and unsolicited neighbor
> >    advertisement message in IPv6 which are broadcast or sent to all
> >    nodes after moving to the new Network Virtualization Edge.  These
> >    messages enable the Network Virtualization Edges update their virtual
> >    machine MAC address to the tunnel endpoint tables.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to