Haha! Regards, Shahram
> On May 23, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Gregory Mirsky <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Because this is IETF J > > From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shahram Davari > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 1:18 PM > To: Greg Mirsky; Anoop Ghanwani > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03.txt > > Greg, > > I am wondering why you are not using Ethernet-OAM over VXLAN rather than > encapsulating BFD in UDP/IP/Ethernet and then encapsulating it in VXLAN? > > Thx > Shahram > > From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Greg Mirsky > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 12:49 PM > To: Anoop Ghanwani > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03.txt > > Now with the correct OOAM-DT address > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > +BFD WG and RTGWG OOAM DT > > Hi Anoop, > thank you for your review and the question. The scope of this draft is only > for the VXLAN. The Overlay OAM Desing Team is working on the Requirements, > Gap Analysis and, if there will be required, enhancements and/or new OAM > protocols for BIER, NSH, VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, and GUE, as defined in its > charter. Would appreciate you review and comments of the two documents the > OOAM-DT already presented in BA meeting: > OOAM Requirements > OAM for Overlay Networks: Gap analysis > In the latter you'll find the example to demonstrate applicability of BFD > Async mode in BIER domain. As we've discussed, other BFD may be applied to > other overlay networks that I've listed above even though their method of > indication OAM payload may be different from BIER. Would you agree, or > suggest to have another example of BFD? > > Regards, Greg > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]> > wrote: > Authors, > > In section 4.1, you have this: > >>> > Next Protocol Field in GPE header MUST be set to IPv4 or IPv6. > ... > The BFD packet MUST be carried inside the inner MAC frame of the > VxLAN packet. The inner MAC frame carrying the BFD payload has the > following format: > >>> > > These two statements seem to contradict each other. If the GPE header > indicates IPv4 or IPv6, then how can the BFD packet be encapsulated within a > MAC frame? > > Can you please clarify? > > Thanks, > Anoop > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) > <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks > > Please could you direct any discussion on this draft to the NVO3 working > group list. > > Regards > > Matthew > > On 18/04/2016, 07:54, "nvo3 on behalf of Vengada Prasad Govindan > (venggovi)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > >Hello all, > > The authors request comments on the draft below. > >Thanks > >Prasad > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 11:33 AM > >To: MALLIK MUDIGONDA (mmudigon) <[email protected]>; Basil Saji > ><[email protected]>; Greg Mirsky <[email protected]>; Vengada > >Prasad Govindan (venggovi) <[email protected]>; Juniper Networks > ><[email protected]>; Sudarsan Paragiri <[email protected]>; > >Santosh Pallagatti <[email protected]>; [email protected] > ><[email protected]> > >Subject: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03.txt > > > > > >A new version of I-D, draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03.txt > >has been successfully submitted by Vengada Prasad Govindan and posted to > >the IETF repository. > > > >Name: draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan > >Revision: 03 > >Title: BFD for VXLAN > >Document date: 2016-04-15 > >Group: Individual Submission > >Pages: 9 > >URL: > >https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03.txt > >Status: > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan/ > >Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03 > >Diff: > >https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-03 > > > >Abstract: > > This document describes use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection > > (BFD) protocol for VXLAN . > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > >tools.ietf.org. > > > >The IETF Secretariat > > > >_______________________________________________ > >nvo3 mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
