Option 1 seems like the only option that has hope of being successful. We should go with that.
- Larry On 7/14/16, 9:21 AM, "nvo3 on behalf of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >WG, > >The NVO3 working group has adopted three data plane encapsulations: >- VXLAN-GPE, >- Geneve, >- GUE (although the draft is moving to the Intarea WG, we >anticipate that NVO3 will still reference this). > >We have discussed this situation with Alia and we feel that there is >little benefit to the community in publishing all three as standards >track RFCs. > >We would note that the discussion on the drafts has been relatively light >since their adoption. There has not been serious discussion about their >relative pros/cons (if any), or about the actual usefulness of their >extensibility or differentiators. > >This leaves two options: > >1) Publish all of them as informational or experimental, potentially >moving one of them to standards track in the future based on >implementation/deployment. >2) Pick one now based on technical and/or implementation/deployment >criteria. > >We would therefore like to gain a sense of what the WG would like to do >with these drafts. > >Please post your comments to the list. We also have a slot to on the NVO3 >agenda in Berlin where we would like to continue this discussion. > >Best regards, > > >Matthew and Sam > > >_______________________________________________ >nvo3 mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
