Matthew,

I have read the darft, and I believe that it’s useful to permanently
document the rationale and requirements behind the normative drafts coming
out of the WG. I think the information would get scattered, lost or
overlooked if buried in the back of other drafts.

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> WG
>
>
>
> As discussed in Berlin, the NVO3 use cases draft (https://www.ietf.org/id/
> draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-08.txt) is reaching maturity and potentially
> ready for WG last call. However, there have been some questions raised
> about how useful a use cases draft is at this stage in the working group,
> and whether some of the content could be more usefully contributed to
> applicability sections of solutions drafts.
>
>
>
> Before starting a last call, we would like to ask that if you have read
> the latest version of the draft, please indicate so to the list, and if so
> whether you believe we should progress this as a stand-alone draft.
>
>
>
> This call for interest will end on Friday  26th August.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to