Hi Joe, Dave, dear all,

I think that the term “subnet” is indeed only defined in a context sensitive 
way.

Unfortunately there is no distinction made between a L2-subnet (aka a broadcast 
domain, or a MEF EVC, or o broadcast domain equivalent achieved without 
broadcast such as EVPN) and a L3-subnet (the object that does not appear in any 
information  model that I am aware of, but which has a size which is defined by 
a subnet-mask and which supports the use case of “change the IP-address range 
assigned to that subnet”.

Part of the reason for complexity is the lack of a proper definition of this 
object in the information model.

If I am wrong – I would be happy to be corrected by someone who can point me to 
an authoritative definition of the term subnet as an object that supports the 
use case “change address range assigned to subnet” without specifying how the 
subnet is built as layer 2 construct (e.g. as Ethernet yellow cable, VLAN in a 
Switched Ethernet domain, VXLAN overlay, EVPN, MEF EVC or ATM point to point 
link).

Thanks to OpenStack for  finally fixing the problem by introducing the method 
“create network”, which creates – exactly – this missing object in an abstract 
way.

So Dave’s question is very valid, simply because the term “subnetting” is not 
properly defined – unless the authors point to a reference RFC where the term 
is defined in an authoritative way.

Lothar



Von: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Joe Touch
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. August 2016 19:30
An: David Allan I <[email protected]>
Cc: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [nvo3] FW: Call for interest on NVO3 use case draft


On 8/13/2016 9:52 AM, David Allan I wrote:
Hi Joe

And the use case for wanting to do subnet emulation is….?

You want the properties of a subnet and/or to emulate the behavior of a shared 
link, i.e., to limit the scope of various protocols, including IP routing, IPv6 
automatic addressing, L2 address translation (virtualizing L2 underneath a 
virtual L3 is needed to support revisitation, where a single node participates 
multiple times in an overlay), and basically any subnet-based resource 
discovery.

Joe



That‘s my question
Dave

From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 8:20 PM
To: David Allan I 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: Call for interest on NVO3 use case draft

The typical use case is to support subnet emulation, e.g., a group of links 
over which broadcast is emulated as with LANE.

On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:11 PM, David Allan I 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
My point would be that introducing  additional complexity in an overlay should 
have a use case associate with it. It would not be something you would do 
gratuitously….

SO I’m looking for the draft to provide a use case for this vs. simply 
mentioning  subnetting without any context ☺

Cheers
Dave

From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Touch
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 5:07 PM
To: David Allan I 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: Call for interest on NVO3 use case draft




On 8/12/2016 4:16 PM, David Allan I wrote:
4.2 Why I would subnet my overlay could use some explanation. I normally think 
of subnetting as a  convenient address summarization technique dependent on 
topology, and with an overlay I don’t have a topology.

The topology of an overlay is determined by its tunnels, just as the topology 
of the underlying net is determined by its links.

A subnet in an overlay corresponds either to a single multipoint tunnel or to a 
set of tunnels that transparently acts as such - just as a subnet in the 
Internet base network corresponds to a shared access link or a set of links 
that transparently act as such (e.g., switched ethernet).

Joe

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to