Hi David Thanks for your comments. I take note of your comment (2) and pointer.
Here is a pointer to the draft https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-padma-ideas-probl em-statement-00.txt Padma On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Black, David <david.bl...@dell.com> wrote: > Hi Dino, > > Here are a couple of areas to consider: > > (1) I don't see any confidentiality requirements. For this and other > NVO3 security > requirements, please see the security considerations section of RFC 7365 > (NVO3 > framework) and draft-ietf-nvo3-arch. The latter contains a new paragraph > on > sensitivity of performance and other monitoring data gathered by the > control > plane - that paragraph was added at the behest of both Security ADs: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7365#section-5 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-arch-08#section-16 > > (2) This item: > > > > 7. Message rate-limiting and other heuristics must be part of the > > > foundational support of the mapping system to protect the system > > > from invalid overloaded conditions. > > suggests that congestion control is also a consideration to protect the > network. > If an existing congestion-controlled transport protocol (e.g., TCP, SCTP, > DCCP) is > not used for control traffic, then see draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis for > discussion > of applicable requirements: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis/ > > Thanks, --David > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3