Thanks for your comments.
I take note of your comment (2) and pointer.
Here is a pointer to the draft
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Black, David <david.bl...@dell.com> wrote:
> Hi Dino,
> Here are a couple of areas to consider:
> (1) I don't see any confidentiality requirements. For this and other
> NVO3 security
> requirements, please see the security considerations section of RFC 7365
> framework) and draft-ietf-nvo3-arch. The latter contains a new paragraph
> sensitivity of performance and other monitoring data gathered by the
> plane - that paragraph was added at the behest of both Security ADs:
> (2) This item:
> > > 7. Message rate-limiting and other heuristics must be part of the
> > > foundational support of the mapping system to protect the system
> > > from invalid overloaded conditions.
> suggests that congestion control is also a consideration to protect the
> If an existing congestion-controlled transport protocol (e.g., TCP, SCTP,
> DCCP) is
> not used for control traffic, then see draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis for
> of applicable requirements:
> Thanks, --David
nvo3 mailing list