GIM>> These were meant for one-way and round-trip delay and delay variation
measurement. Of course, accuracy of measurements will depend on
implementation.

Would be good to include a description of what these are and how they are
derived in the draft, unless there's already a reference for it.

GIM>> Could you please explain "starting the counting from 0" in regard to
timestamp. If clocks are synchronized, why would that matter?

This was just an editorial comment--that the 4 timestamps should be
numbered 0-3, rather than 1-4.

Anoop

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Anoop,
> thank you for the questions. Please find my answers in-line and tagged
> GIM>>.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> A few questions:
>>
>> - Is there a reference for background/requirements that resulted in this?
>>
> GIM>> Yes, we have Overlay OAM Requirements draft
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-02>.
> Comments and questions ae most welcome.
>
>> - Would be good to have a figure showing where in the packet the OOAM
>> header resides.
>>
> GIM>> Great suggestion. Will add into the next update. In general, OOAM
> Header immediately follows the overlay encapsulation, e.g. NVO3, NSH or
> BIER.
>
>> - Does the length include the OOAM header?
>>
> GIM>> Yes, the Length includes the header and reflects the length of the
> OAM message.
>
>> - What are the 4 timestamp values for?  (I have a slight preference for
>> starting the counting from 0.)
>>
> GIM>> These were meant for one-way and round-trip delay and delay
> variation measurement. Of course, accuracy of measurements will depend on
> implementation.
> GIM>> Could you please explain "starting the counting from 0" in regard to
> timestamp. If clocks are synchronized, why would that matter?
>
>>
>> Anoop
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ignas, et. al,
>>> thank you for the update on the meeting.
>>> Please note that the OOAM drafts been updated and updates will be
>>> highlighted at the meeting:
>>>
>>>    - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-header-02
>>>    - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-demand-cc-cv-02
>>>
>>> Appreciate your reviews, comments and suggestions. Contributions are
>>> always welcome.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Ignas Bagdonas <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear working group,
>>>>
>>>> The Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) Working Group will hold a
>>>> virtual interim meeting on March 01, 2017 at 08:00 Pacific, 11:00 Eastern,
>>>> 16:00 London, 00:00 Beijing time for one hour. Meeting will be via Webex,
>>>> connection URL:
>>>>
>>>> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m45df3a1f21344df3440a
>>>> a9be26895cce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> More details can be found on the IETF interim meeting page:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim/nvo3-2017-03-01.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agenda:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. Note well, meeting logistics, and introduction (chairs, 3 min)
>>>>
>>>> 2. Encapsulation discussion (25 min)
>>>>
>>>>    - draft-dt-nvo3-encap (Sami Boutros/Pankaj Garg)
>>>>
>>>>    - Encapsulation discussion.
>>>>
>>>> 3. OAM discussion (15 min)
>>>>
>>>>    - draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-header (Greg Mirsky)
>>>>
>>>>    - draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-demand-cc-cv (Greg Mirsky)
>>>>
>>>>    - OAM discussion
>>>>
>>>> 4. IETF98 planning (15 min)
>>>>
>>>>    - Meeting format and topics (WG chairs)
>>>>
>>>>    - Discussion
>>>>
>>>> 5. Closing (chairs, 2 min)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ignas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nvo3 mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nvo3 mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to