Given the wide distribution and formalism of this so called side meeting, I'd like to remind all of RFC6771 as well as remind the contributors that there are chartered WGs that would be open to hearing from them.
Lou PS With chair hat off, I'd love to hear why this isn't a BoF? Was it simply to sidestep the two bof rule? On 3/22/2017 4:37 PM, Kiran.Makhijani wrote: > > [Changed recepients from BCC to ‘To’: NV03, DMM, DETNET, TEAS, ANIMA, > NFVRG to bypass list-owner’s approval; Please don’t reply-all] > > > > Hello all, > > We invite you to participate in NetSlices side meeting at IETF 98. The > details are as follows - > > > > - Location: Room Vevey 1/2, > > - Date/Time: 2017.03.27, 18:15-21:15 > > - Agenda: > https://github.com/netslices/IETF-NetSlices/tree/master/IETF98_Sidemeeting02 > > Please see detailed (agenda.md) and summarized (agenda.txt) text. > > Scope of the meeting is mentioned in agenda as well. > > > > Please feel free to forward this invitation to anyone interested. > > > > Regards > > Kiran, DongJie, Alex, Stewart > > > > _______________________________________________ > detnet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
