> On Apr 7, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > The main thing is: > > I think yours work and the OAM design team should be focus to define the OAM > related data and the OAM mechanism and there is a lot to do on this area > .and try to make it uniform on all the diffenet encapsulations > (NVO3,BEIR,SFC) and not dealing with the encapsulation itself. By this you > mixed all things up and we will achieve nothing . > > GIM2>> I feel that you assume that the proposed solution is for NVO3 only > and thus had not thought about SFC and BIER. Dave Dolson had pointed out that > the proposed solution is beneficial for SFC. > >
Could you please elaborate on what specifically and precisely the benefit for SFC is? I might have missed what’s other than overhead in this indirection. Thanks, — Carlos Pignataro, [email protected] “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis." _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
