- As I mentioned in a rebuttal to this objection the flag-fields can be extended with for flags. This has already been implemented, the objection is not valid.
DT: We are documenting the concerns based on what is already out there – a mailing list rebuttal or how it can be sorted out with “this has already been implemented” doesn’t sound very helpful. Sorry, I don't understand this statement at all. A technical objection was raised, a thorough explanation on the mailing list was given as to why it's not valid, the protocol draft describes the necessary mechanism, and the mechanism has been implemented and running. The discussion pertaining to the this (and many other issues) is in the nvo3 archives and could have been found with a little diligence. If you are truly attempting to do an objective analysis and perform an objective selection for one of these protocols then how can this possibly not be helpful? Anyway, please remove the objection from the next version your draft, it is NOT valid! Tom _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
