Hi Pat,
Here are some comments:
1. Current document meets the SR-IOVscenario in telecom cloud network
requirement I presented in last IEEE 802.1meeting. So I think it is good to
move it forward.
2. Section 40.5, it seems that EVBextension is a mandatory part to support VDP
extension. EVB is LLDP based. Soif tNVE and nNVE are not adjacent, how would
they negotiate the capabilitiesusing EVB?
3. section 41.4 should add someclarification text about step a is not necessary
for NVO3 case.
4. section 41.2.10.2, the state should sendpre-associate with resource
reservation rather than pre-associate to revoke thestate back.
5. IP address extensions in VDP are ok tome.
Thanks --------------------B.R.LuHuang
China Mobile Research Institute
Mobile: +86 13810820540
Pat Thaler <[email protected]> 于 2017年5月10日, 星期三, 上午 2:01 写道：
Dear colleagues,
The Data Center Bridging Task Group of IEEE 802.1 will be meeting on Wednesday,
17 May. A number of people from NVO3 volunteered to review the draft of P802Qcn
VDP extension for NVO3.
To date I haven't received any feedback from those reviews. It would be very
helpful to receive feedback before our upcoming meeting. It is difficult to
progress this draft without input from NVO3 participants.
Regards,Pat_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
