Hi, Bob,

This approach seems to assume an integrated implementation of multiple
protocol layers.

There are other cases where the "shim" is added indirectly, as a packet
is "tunneled" independently over multiple protocols.

I scanned the draft and didn't see this addressed explicitly (maybe I
missed it). It's implied throughout  3.2 but never stated as a MAY,
e.g., systems MAY support ECN across shim layers but are NOT REQUIRED to
do so. Can that sort of explicit caveat be included? This case might be
added as a final bullet in the list at the end of section 3.2.

Joe


On 6/16/2017 7:25 AM, Bob Briscoe wrote:
> Fabio, Larry, Uri,
>
> I notice VXLAN-GPE is on the IETF standards track.
> It will need to specify support for propagation of the ECN field
> between inner and outer for cases when there is (or might be) an IP
> header (v4 or v6) within the L2 encapsulation, and when the outer is
> IP (v4 or v6).
>
> I believe ECN propagation between inner and outer is already in the
> Linux code for VXLAN, but it's not specified in RFC7348, so other
> implementations might overlook it. Given that ECN is heavily used in
> DCs (e.g. for DCTCP), this is a significant omission.
>
> Please refer to draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim> and
> RFC6040.
>
> I will warn you that, unless you believe that all existing VXLAN
> implementations already support ECN,  this will not be just a
> straightforward case of referencing the appropriate RFCs. If there
> might be non-ECN VXLAN decapsulators out there, the tunnel ingress
> will have to know (by config or capability negotiation) whether the
> egress supports ECN propagation, and if not, switch to 'compatibility
> mode' (zeroing the outer ECN field). That could require definition of
> a capability parameter during tunnel set-up (unless you envisage
> tunnel set up will always be by administrative config).
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>
> -- 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to