Hi I am assuming you are talking about VXLAN-GPE. Right?
Thx Shahram > On Sep 30, 2017, at 4:42 AM, Reith, Lothar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Gang, > > Let me rephrase your question as follows: Is it possible that a L3 VNI > instance uses the same identifier as a L2 VNI instance, > and if yes, would it be a recommended practice or not (why not?). > > > > Lothar > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von GangChen > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. September 2017 05:34 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [nvo3] VxLAN L2 VNI vs L3 VNI > > Hello group, > > Just intend to figure out the relation between L2 VNI and L3 VNI. > > Considering the following simple scenario, a tenant has subnet1 and subnet2. > Those subnets use L2 VNI 2000 and L2 VNI 3000 respectively. > The distributed L3 NVEs are used to connect two subnets. > Since L3 VNI is another VxLAN segment, L3 NVE use different VNI with L2 VNI, > I’m wondering to know what’s the issue if the L3 VNI is identical with L2 VNI. > For example, L3 NVE takes 2000 as L3 VNI in this case. > L3 VNE is router-capable. It will separate two broadcast domains natively. > It seems no impacts. Is there anything I miss? > > > +————+ +————+ > | L3 NVE |=====L3 VNI=======| L3 NVE | > +————+ +————+ > || || > L2 VNI: 2000 L2 VNI: 3000 > || || > +————+ +————+ > | Subnet1 | | Subnet2 | > +————-+ +————-+ > > BRs > > Gang > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
