Hi Matthew, The updated version has been uploaded. Thanks a lot.
Rgds, Yizhou From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:49 PM To: Liyizhou <[email protected]>; NVO3 <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10 Hi Yizhou The document shepherd’s write up includes a specific question about whether I believe the references are appropriately categorized as ‘Normative’ or ‘Informative’, so it would be better to quickly fix this in the draft now, so I can answer ‘yes’ to this and can push the publication requested button. Best regards Matthew From: Liyizhou <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 12:56 To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10 Hi Matthew, Yes. It is more appropriate to put it as informative. How about we update it in next revision? Thanks. Rgds, Yizhou From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 6:19 PM To: Liyizhou <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10 Hi Yizhou Sorry, one other comment. Does the reference to IGMP (RFC2236) really need to be normative? It is only referenced as an example in Section 3.3. Can you make it informative? Thanks Matthew From: Liyizhou <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, 8 January 2018 at 02:07 To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10 Hi Matthew, Thanks a lot. A new version addressing the LC comments has been uploaded. (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req/) Rgds, Yizhou From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 6:48 PM To: NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10 This email closes the working group last call for this draft. Authors: Please upload a new revision addressing the last call comments. I will then proceed with the publication process. Best regards Matthew From: Dacheng Zhang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 14:32 To: NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10 This email begins a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10draft-ietf-nvo3-hpvr2nve-cp-req-10.txt. Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group list. If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments and believe it is ready for publication as an Informational RFC, please also indicate so to the WG email list. This working group last call will close on Wednesday 20th December 2017. Best regards Matthew and Sam
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
