As a coauthor, I believe the document is ready for publication as a standards track RFC after addressing the comments from Daniel and Anoop (which should not cause significant change).
Jesse On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:14 AM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <[email protected]> wrote: > > This email begins a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt. > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group list. > If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments and > believe it is ready for publication as a standards track RFC, please also > indicate so to the WG email list. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this > document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > Currently there are two IPR disclosures against this document. > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly > respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in > conformance with IETF rules. > > > > This poll will run until Friday 26th October. > > > > Regards > > > > Matthew and Sam _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
