Folks

It is important that we get consensus on this topic in order to move the OAM 
work forward.

Please read the draft and comment on the issues raised below.

Best regards,

Matthew

From: Dacheng Zhang <[email protected]> on behalf of Greg Mirsky 
<[email protected]>
Date: Monday, 2 December 2019 at 19:49
To: NVO3 <[email protected]>
Subject: [nvo3] Active OAM encapsulation for Geneve

Dear All,
though there was no formal discussion of 
draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam-00>
 in Singapore, I've captured one comment that is, in my view, is very much 
relevant to resolving the question posted in the draft:
Not all stacks support MPLS encapsulation.
Consequently, the proposed in the third paragraph of Section 
2.1<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam-00#section-2.1> use 
of MPLS GAL is not a viable solution. Could people familiar with the 
deployments share their expertise and experiences?

Regards,
Greg
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to