You’re welcome Anoop. I will let the RFC editor to take care of that last nit ☺
From: Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]> Date: Monday, July 28, 2025 at 1:20 AM To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]> Cc: Luc André Burdet <[email protected]>, Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]>, NVO3 <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, nvo3-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00 Thanks Ali. FYI -- the issue with 802 references pointed out by Luc Andre does not appear to have been fixed in the new version. On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 7:22 PM Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Anoop, Thanks for pointing out the nits. I took care of them. See below .. From: Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, June 20, 2025 at 10:50 PM To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Luc André Burdet <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, nvo3-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00 I support the document for publication as an RFC. A few editorial nits (in addition to the ones below): - It looks like the new text uses "VxLAN". Should probably stick with "VXLAN" for consistency. Ali> done - Expand VXLAN only once, the very first time. Ali> done - For consistency with the rest of the doc, should probably capitalize "Section" when referring to section numbers in Section 1. Ali> done - In Section 4.2, there appears to be a spurious line break in the middle of the 3rd paragraph. Ali> removed but it was also in the RFC! - There seem to be several spurious line breaks in Section 5. Ali> removed Cheers, Ali On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 11:37 AM Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Luc, Please see my reply inline … From: Luc André Burdet <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, June 9, 2025 at 6:57 AM To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, nvo3-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00 I support this document being published as a standards track document. To that effect: * The status in -00 is still Informational, should it be updated to Standards Track? “Informational” is the correct designation. * The new Section 8.2 defines “sixteen flag bits” + 16 Reserved, 8 Reserved. This is at odds with the field sizes in Section 5 (8 Flags + VNI + 24 Reserved + 8 Reserved) It doesn’t change the reserved bits assignment in the IANA section but good catch nonetheless for consistency w/ section 5. Will be updated in the next rev. Additionally a few nits: * The 802 references are rendering as “_02.1X” (underscore?) * The alignment of bit headers in the figures 1 & 2 is off >From the XML looks like it was pulled into a bullet-list instead of the figure >itself Will be taken care of in next rev. Cheers, Ali Regards, Luc André Luc André Burdet | Cisco | [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | Tel: +1 613 254 4814 From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, June 6, 2025 at 08:06 To: NVO3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, nvo3-chairs <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00 This email begins a working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00 - Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis/> Please review the draft and send any comments to the NVO3 mailing list, particularly if you do or do not support this draft being published as a standards track RFC. An IPR poll was conducted as a part of the very recent adoption poll for the draft. However, if you have subsequently become aware of any IPR that was not previously declared, please respond. There are no IPR disclosures published on the datatracker against either this draft or RFC7348, and I received no IPR disclosures during WG adoption. This WG last call closes on Monday 23rd June 2025. Best regards Matthew _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
