On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:19:32 +0100
Darren Kenny <Darren.Kenny at Sun.COM> wrote:

> I don't think that it would matter - but it would seem to make sense that in
> attempting to set it to a multiple value that it should return an error...

I agree about the error.  I'm not so sure that it doesn''t matter.
Pragmatically you are probably right.  But theoretically there could be
other protocols here besides IPv4 and IPv6.  I think that should be
represented in this being a list.  If it is really easy I might get a
wink more some night.

                        mph

> 
> Darren.
> 
> On 08/04/2009 13:54, Anurag S. Maskey wrote:
> > "ip-version" is not a multi-valued property.  You'd have to specify 
> > "all" for both v4 and v6.
> > 
> > Does it make sense to remove the "all" value and instead make the 
> > "ip-version" property multi-valued?
> > 
> > Anurag
> > 
> > 
> > Michael Hunter wrote:
> >> Why is this silently failing?
> >>
> >> nwamcfg:ncp:User:ncu:e1000g0> set ip-version=ipv4,ipv6
> >> nwamcfg:ncp:User:ncu:e1000g0> list
> >> NCU:e1000g0
> >>    type            ip
> >>    class           ip
> >>    parent          "User"
> >>    ipv4-addrsrc    dhcp,static
> >>    ipv4-addr       "10.0.5.50","10.0.5.51"
> >>    ip-version      ipv4
> >> nwamcfg:ncp:User:ncu:e1000g0> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nwam-dev mailing list
> >> nwam-dev at opensolaris.org
> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev
> >>   
> > _______________________________________________
> > nwam-dev mailing list
> > nwam-dev at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev

Reply via email to