On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:43:43 +0100 Darren Kenny <Darren.Kenny at Sun.COM> wrote:
[...] > Darren. > > > [1] - This is also an issue in it's own right if you look at the bug: > > http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsf?cr=6555596-2174139 > > where James McPherson tells me that is against the RFC standards... > (it would be nice if someone in the know could advise me here) 1912 obsoletes 1537 so don't worry about 1537. Both are informational and as far as I can tell are mostly about DNS server configuration. A quick scan of the document didn't turn up whatever the person thought 1912 had against this type of configuration. These documents are also over a decade old. mph > _______________________________________________ > nwam-dev mailing list > nwam-dev at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev
