NWAM West: 8:30AM MPK/11:30AM BUR/4:30PM DUB

Attendees: Darren, Steff, Karen, Victor, Alan, Michael, Anurag, Renee

1. Phase 1 status
   - Alan, Anurag, Michael, and Renee are wrapping up existing dev tasks
     and rolling in new tasks from last month's meetings (many of which are
     already complete); will have new dev complete date end of this week.

   - GUI dev moving along; Darren estimates about 2 more weeks.

   - Design review: it's been a while since we've had a formal one; need
     to figure out what's needed.

2. Menlo Park week: February 2 - 6
   - Victor has conference rooms reserved

   - Will plan on a time when we can all gather, though it's unlikely to
     be at the regular west meeting time (8:30 AM in Menlo Park)!

3. Doc status
   - Steff mostly working on crossbow; planning to review latest GUI spec.

4. Equipment
   - Victor will be placing an order this week; let him know if you need
     anything (this is small stuff, not capital).  We already have a request
     in for some wireless gear.


NWAM East: 5:00PM MPK/9:00AM BJS

Attendees: Karen, Victor, Eric, John, Lizhong, Renee

1. Test development status
   - We need updated end dates for the schedule, so we can better gauge
     where we are.

2. Parallel test and feature development
   The process has to be more iterative than we'd sometimes like: the test
   developers come up with good questions while doing their development,
   which lead to changes/clarifications in the feature code and design, which
   then forces changes to the tests.  Though this isn't always optimal, the
   feedback loop does help improve the product, and the alternative of
   completing the feature development before beginning test dev isn't feasible.

3. Man page update
   Renee updated the nwamcfg draft man page yesterday to reflect the changes
   we've been discussing in the past couple weeks.

4. Test priorities
   John posed a question about relative priority of different parts of test
   effort; the automated tests are good to validate the code, and for future
   regression testing.  However, past experience with phase 0 and 0.5 point
   to the importance of manual testing (how nwam responds with different
   hardware, different APs, on reboot, on restart, etc.).  Are there things
   we can do to improve/better prepare for that aspect of our testing?

   John will think about this and follow up over e-mail.

Reply via email to