http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=10156
amaguire <alan.maguire at sun.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ACCEPTED |CLOSED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from amaguire <alan.maguire at sun.com> 2009-09-15 08:24:40 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > For SMF services, we do not validate that the service exists. We only
> > validate
> > that the string is a valid FMRI. (This is similar to our validating of
> > files,
> > where we don't check if the file exists, but just that path is absolute).
> >
> > If this validation scheme for SMF services is to continue, then we cannot
> > ensure that svcs-enable and svcs-disable do not contain duplicates. A user
> > could put "sendmail" in one and "smtp:sendmail" in the other.
>
> a bit messy I know, but how about expanding FMRIs where possible for
> comparison
> and doing full string matches where it's not (i.e. if the FMRI expansion
> fails,
> indicating the named service instance doesn't presently exist)?
>
> It's probably not a big deal since the GUI will likely restrict selection
> of enable/disable services such that the lists cannot overlap, but I guess if
> it is reasonably easy to solve at the library level, we should give it a go.
11082 will remove these properties until we have extended SMF profiles. Closing
as wontfix for now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
