On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 07:25:34PM +0000, Alan Maguire wrote: > Renee Danson Sommerfeld wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:37:30PM +0000, Alan Maguire wrote: >> >>> I still need to test 12493 but I wanted to get the webrev out >>> for review ASAP: >>> >>> http://zhadum.east/export/ws/amaguire/nwam1-bugs/webrev >>> >> >> Fixes for 12462 and 12472 look good.
Not sure where you are with builds and testing, but I'd say these two fixes are ready to go back as soon as you're ready. I'd rather not have them waiting on resolution of the bfu questions. >> Some questions about 12493: In addition to adding those services, we >> also add dependencies on those services (nwam depends on netcfg, many >> services depend on location). What happens to those dependencies when >> we remove the services? >> >> I'm thinking the ones that depend on location might be okay, because >> they're added as dependents of the location service, so removing that >> service removes those dependents. But I think nwamd has the dependency >> on netcfg, so just removing netcfg won't change that. >> >> > What about making the dependency nwam has on netcfg > a dependent in netcfg.xml? I suppose that would be okay. >> And for that matter, what happens to the nwam manifest? The phase 1 >> manifest is quite different from the earlier one. >> >> > Good point - I'll check on that when my build completes. Keep me posted. But one caution: I don't think backwards-bfu'ing is sufficiently important to merit a lot of your time. If there are quick easy things you can do to make it work better, okay; but don't slave away at this. -renee
