John Beck wrote:
> Michael> 3.1.1.2 I don't get the last 2 sentences. "For example, when a user
> Michael> creates a[n] IPMP link, the underlying IP interfaces of that link
> Michael> will be unplumbed. The daemon should handle this case."
That was written based on a misunderstanding of the IPMP
re-architecture.
> Michael> 3.1.1.3 EV_LINK_UP - is this and the other related sections really
> Michael> about links under interfaces or can we talk about the links on their
> Michael> own?
>
> Michael> 3.1.1.5 need to get rid of ??
>
> I'd like to get Kacheong's input on all of these 3.1.1 sub-sections.
The whole section 3 will be replaced. The reason I have
not updated my write up "Link and IP interface handling" I
sent earlier is that I am still waiting for all those NCP/
NCU, ENA, ... issues to be settled. They all tie to that
section.
--
K. Poon.
kacheong.poon at sun.com
