"override" a method. :-)
On Thursday, 18 July 2013 16:10:30 UTC+1, Ash Moran wrote: > > > On 18 Jul 2013, at 15:18, Sean Bamforth <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > What I find interesting in the Active* objects is that there's a > tendency not to subclass methods. Instead, people will assign container > class methods to event properties. I suspect it's because some languages > don't allow you to subclass methods in an object definition, and people are > used to coding against that. > > What do you mean by "subclass a method"? "Subclass" is an action I only > know how to apply to a class, not a method. > > -- > http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashmoran > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
