Hello Jon, http://www.open1x.org
Most cisco devices have had a derivative of this for some time -- Best regards, evilbunny mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.SydneyWireless.com - Exercise your communications freedom to make it do what you never thought possible... Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 3:36:49 AM, you wrote: JB> http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/09/17/cybersecurity.ap/index.html JB> <snip> JB> Another dropped proposal would have called for companies to work on JB> securing wireless networks, and barred the use of such networks until JB> they could be proven secure. Wireless technology, which is increasingly JB> cheap and easy to use, has been criticized as difficult to secure. JB> </snip> JB> Did I miss something? Would this on a technical scale require some sort JB> of Wi-Fi certification in order for wireless networks to exist in JB> commercial places? If from what I can recall there is an 802.11(x) JB> proposal already in the works somewhere for this exact thing, am I right? JB> - Jon JB> -- JB> NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ JB> Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ JB> Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
