It seems to me like there should be another term/definition for what
"Wireless Friendly ISP" really means based on the response. Because any
ISP is really technically wireless friendly but what you are really
testing is their limitations. Then again comes back to the fact that
the ISP wants to squeeze $X out of you based on bandwidth you don't
really use and want to give away to a community. I still say its no
different than a cell and per-minute structure, Im charged for them
anyway even if I don't use them, here it's bandwidth. Fortunatley there
is a way to give out bandwidth :-)
Maybe should be "WiFi Community ISP" to really reflect an ISP's terms.
- Jon
Terry Schmidt wrote:
The EFF contacted Speakeasy to update their wireless friendly ISP list,
and to find out if Speakeasy's AUP would allow wireless sharing. Turns
out they don't.
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
