On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Jon Baer wrote:

> It's about containment ... which I personally find to be a more bigger
> security pitfall than what currently exists.  I dont know what the odds
> are of enterprise/companies switching to IR-based tech vs. radio but it
> makes more sense than splurging more $$$ trying to defend open
> frequencies ...
>

Very unlikely.  How many IR-based 802.11 products do you know of?
(Yes, one of the spec for 802.11 has IR as a carrier mechanism)

Kevin "Starfox" Arima

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to