-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After reading this:
http://www.computeruser.com/news/02/12/13/news1.html (about how XP queries APs w/ SSIDs (stored on the client) which are suppose to be hidden) ... making it defeat the whole purpose, why even have it as an option on an AP then? It seems that despite almost ANY type of standardization that MS would have their completely own agenda w/ any type of authentication. Id personally wouldnt find this disturbing if VPN/IPSec is already installed but makes me wonder what else MS does which u don't know about ... and this port 137 issue drives me nuts as well. - - Jon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBPf61HEHb24uaDK9HEQIzPwCgtjDcLqHl62yGyo+rcQbxaqXFpmwAnjDa Q0+uFvaB4EgpP+jPKqDvlT4l =Ra6k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
